Essay mengzi moral philosophy

Languages with up to 50 books: Afrikaans   Aleut   Arabic   Arapaho   Breton   Bulgarian   Caló   Catalan   Cebuano   Czech   Estonian   Farsi   Frisian   Friulian   Gaelic, Scottish   Galician   Gamilaraay   Greek, Ancient   Hebrew   Icelandic   Iloko   Interlingua   Inuktitut   Irish   Japanese   Kashubian   Khasi   Korean   Lithuanian   Maori   Mayan Languages   Middle English   Nahuatl   Napoletano-Calabrese   Navajo   North American Indian   Norwegian   Occitan   Ojibwa   Old English   Polish   Romanian   Russian   Sanskrit   Serbian   Slovenian   Tagabawa   Telugu   Welsh   Yiddish  

Holding such a view is one of the reasons why Mozi is committed to a rejection of the philosophical position that the happenings in the course of reality’s process are predestined or fated ( ming ). Mozi’s arguments on this subject are gathered in the “Against Fate” chapters (35-37) of his text. A principal argument used by Mozi against the position that reality is fated is a pragmatic one. He holds that accepting such a position would mean that one’s status, health, wealth, success, and longevity are already determined and not consequences of one’s effort or choices in life. Taking this view would lead to disaster (). In fact, Mozi says the concept of fate should be regarded as a creation of evil kings and peasant farmers. His point is that some kings used this philosophical idea as a means to justify their positions of power and wealth, while the peasants used it to explain why their reduced situation in life was not a result of living wrongly, or failing to better themselves; that is, it was fated that they be poor. This explains in part why Mozi considered the ontological concept of ming (fate) to be one a philosopher must reject.

Essay mengzi moral philosophy

essay mengzi moral philosophy


essay mengzi moral philosophyessay mengzi moral philosophyessay mengzi moral philosophyessay mengzi moral philosophy